Business Risk Assessment

html>
Activities
Deliverable
Day 0
Pre-engagement preparation
  • QBR — CFO, VF, engagement manager (min. 3): risk hypothesis, role assignments, sensitivities
  • Project schedule locked; interview calendar confirmed with all 6 participants
  • Data request sent (tiered — T1 required Day 1 morning)
  • Recording consent obtained
Engagement brief · signed-off schedule · data request sent
Day 1
Preparation + data intake
  • VF owns interview preparation (templates adapted to risk hypothesis)
  • CFO owns data quality and understanding — policy, anomalies, narrative signals
  • VF owns data availability — ingestion, format conversion, platform setup
  • Data team: normalization begins (2h)
Data quality memo · tailored interview guides per role · ingestion confirmed
Day 2
On-site interviews I + data processing
  • Both FTEs: CEO (60 min), CFO/Finance (60 min), COO (60 min) — 3 interviews
  • CFO leads conversation; VF records and scores in real time
  • Post-interview debrief 10–15 min per session
  • Data team: automated processing continues in parallel
3 recorded + transcribed interviews · debrief notes · Day 2 scoring impressions
Day 3
On-site interviews II + data processing
  • Both FTEs: Commercial/Sales (60 min), Controller (45 min), Board member/Shareholder (45 min) — 3 interviews
  • CFO leads Commercial and Board/Shareholder; VF leads Controller
  • Board/Shareholder interview: governance quality, stakeholder confidence, strategic oversight — maps to S1
  • Outstanding Tier 2 data gaps collected; all 6 transcripts complete by end of day
All 6 interviews complete · full transcripts · T2 gaps resolved
Day 4
Automated processing + four-eyes review
  • Automated: ratios, IDW S6 scores, all 6 transcript scorings, benchmark pull (2h data)
  • Four-eyes: CFO leads interview transcript review; VF leads data output review
  • Cross-verify; contradictions flagged as high-value diagnostic findings
Validated interview scores · validated data scores · contradiction log
Day 5
Synthesis + AI narrative review
  • AI generates narrative overnight: S0–S6 draft, risk signals, contradictions
  • Four-eyes: CFO leads IDW S6 positioning; VF leads data evidence validation
  • CFO confirms final S0–S6 position and top 5 risk signals
Confirmed S0–S6 position · validated risk signals · approved AI narrative
Day 6
Report auto-generation + next-steps discussion
  • Full 8-section report auto-populated from Day 5 validated outputs
  • FTEs: joint discussion on follow-on service, feedback session framing, sensitivities
  • Data team: peer benchmarking finalization (2h)
Complete report draft · next-steps brief · benchmark data confirmed
Day 7
AI action plan + peer benchmarking + finalization
  • AI generates 30–60 day action plan (IDW S6 remediation, urgency × impact)
  • Data team finalizes sector peer benchmarking (2h)
  • Four-eyes: CFO reviews action plan; VF reviews benchmarking; cross-verify
Finalized report with action plan + peer benchmarking
Day 8
Internal sign-off + presentation development
  • Both FTEs: full end-to-end report review; engagement manager final read
  • Four-eyes on complete document; report signed off
  • Feedback session deck built; session roles agreed
Signed-off report · approved feedback deck · role assignments
Day 9
Reserve
  • Absorbs slippage without compressing quality or delivery timeline
  • If on schedule: dry-run, polish, client scheduling confirmation
Buffer — no planned deliverable
Day 10
Report delivery
  • Report delivered electronically with covering note
  • Feedback session formally scheduled: date, attendees, agenda
Report delivered · feedback session booked
D11–14
Feedback session (90–120 min)
  • Both FTEs present jointly; CFO leads findings + action plan; VF leads benchmarking + data
  • 45 min findings, 45 min action plan discussion
  • Session record within 48h; transition to next VF engagement discussed
Session record · agreed next steps · engagement transition brief